Movie Stats:
Released 1940 (USA)
American, in English (there’s a tiny bit of non-translated
French)
Director – Alfred Hitchcock
Stars – Laurence Olivier, Joan Fontaine (who is Olivia de
Havilland’s sister, which I never knew before!), and Judith Anderson
Plot Summary:
While working as a paid companion to an elderly woman in
Monte Carlo, an innocent, naïve young woman (Fontaine) – she's never given a
first name in the movie – meets a mysterious and handsome widower by the name
of Maxim de Winter (Olivier). After a whirlwind romance, the two marry. Soon,
Maxim moves his young bride back to his estate, Manderley, where his first wife,
Rebecca, died. The new Mrs. de Winter strives to be “perfectly happy,” but the
memory of Rebecca seems to cast a powerful shadow over Manderley, and secrets
abound. Judith Anderson stars as the supremely creepy housekeeper Mrs. Danvers.
Bad Stuff:
The film moved really slowly. At the same time, everyone
spoke very quickly, like they wanted to see how many words they could cram into
one sentence. It was disorienting.
In a way, it didn’t really “feel” like a Hitchcock film.
Perhaps this is because I’ve mostly seen his later films, which were more
action-packed (i.e. “The Birds” and “North by Northwest”). This was less
suspenseful and more baseline creepy.
Good Stuff:
Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers. She was nominated for Best
Supporting Actress. She should have won.
It does a great job of setting the tone right from the very
beginning.
The Verdict:
[THIS VERDICT WILL CONTAIN SOME MINOR SPOILERS.]
On the one hand, I didn’t really like this movie. I thought
it was boring.
On the other hand, the more I thought about it, the more I
began to appreciate the mastery of it. At the beginning of the movie, I really
disliked Maxim. I hated the way he treated the young woman. I hated the fact
that the only reason he seemed to want her was because of her innocence. It
felt like he was using her. It also made me dislike the young woman for being
so stupid as to fall for someone who would mistreat her so.
However, as the tale grinds toward its end, you come to
understand why Maxim is the way he is, and why it was important for him to find
a wife like her. His intentions are not so nefarious as they seemed. He is not, in fact, the villain. By the time
you get to the big reveal of what was truly going on at Manderley before
Rebecca died, it actually is kind of shocking.
3 comments:
I saw this as a teenager and liked it enough to read the book on which the movie is based. For me, the image of the pillow burning has stuck with me, even if I can't quite remember the nefarious things that were happening to cause said scene.
I think this was also the movie producer David O. Selznick (He of Gone With the Wind fame) used to lure Hitchcock from England. I watch a great documentary called something like "Hitchcock and Selznick" which was very interesting, the contrast between the two men.
Wait, the internet tells me it's called "Hitchcock, Selznick and the End of Hollywood." Here's a link.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181577/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
Do you think that the book was better than the movie? Just curious.
That movie sounds very interesting. I feel like I should start a "movies to watch" list, but I fear that it would be too much like my "books to read" list, which just grows longer and longer as I fall further behind. /sigh
Like you said, I need a meth habit or something, haha.
I have vague memories of liking the book better than the movie. But I don't know why.
And I love my "to-read" list on Goodreads. I've started calling it the place where books go to die.
Post a Comment